In evolution other creatures must fight to survive and better themselves. I belive strongly that animals cannot speak for themselves.
Likewise as humans we have continued our survival of the fittest with a desire to better mankind and our understanding and lives. In nature we find that the world is a hostile environment, although now we have acheived dominace we forget how unforgiving it is and in my arguement one phrase truly comes to my mind "Survival of the Fittest".
Yet again, there are people who agree with me, as well with you. Con Should animals be tested on did animals ever do to you? It is the nature of the world and the biodiversity of some animals is even preserved by animal testing. Is it not then justifiable to kill these animals.
Parasites for example exploit other lifeforms everyday without their consent or knowledge. I would also like to counter your point that "How would u like if I put drugs in you or put make up on u to see how it works, when it can be dangerous!
Therefore, in this instance in order for humans to survive animals must at first be used. When invertebrate animals are considered, the estimated number rises to as high as million. How would u like if I put drugs in you or put make up on u to see how it works, when it can be dangerous!
So please choose my side and we can take on the animal haters! After the experiments conclude, essentially all of the animals who have survived the research are killed. I would argue that then animal testing saves more lives and will continue to do so.
However, you also have appeared to have neglected the fact that all pharmaceutical drugs have to go through clinical trials. Report this Argument Pro I do not wish in truth to put my arguement to the extremes but in some terms the preservation of animal species is in part reliant on humanities need of them in circumstances, the only reason that we have cattle and chickens is our reliance on them to survive and likewise is our reliance on animal testing.
I do not think animals should be tested for anything! So we need to speak for them! Report this Argument Pro As people we exploit each other as much we do anything else and we even give it a title its called business. I would also like to say how would you react to an animal that was killed by a fox to allow its survival, and compare would it not be more benefical and useful for it to save human lives through testing?
My next point stands as a rhetorirically would you rather put yourself in the position of these animals, would you yourself go and force another human to go and take the place of an animal. I feel that so long as the animals are cared for in suitable conditions and are looked after well. Report this Argument Con I am going to this short, I do agree in some points you have made.
I would like to highlight though that " essentially all of the animals who have survived the research are killed".Jan 17, · I dont think animals should be tested on if it is so ok! How abot people do it and say hey i will and maybe even just take people because it is so right to take people i love animals and this.
Animal Testing - Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing? Animals themselves benefit from the results of animal testing.
If vaccines were not tested on animals, millions of animals would have died from rabies, distemper, feline leukemia, infectious hepatitis virus, tetanus, anthrax, and canine parvo virus.
Yes, animals should be tested on, because it is a fair way to make sure that new drugs and products are safe. If something is toxic, it is important to test the drug on an animal, before it kills a human. Here are the top reasons to stop animal testing. If these atrocious acts were committed outside laboratories, they would be felonies.
Only two people in my class are saying that animals should be tested on, but at least it’s only two and not more.
I’m also going to attempt to be a vegetarian.
It’s not gonna be easy. I love my chicken. Bekoff's most recent Op-Ed was "The Dog's Telltale Tail" This article was adapted from "'Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?" in Psychology Today.
The views expressed are. Read the pros and cons of the debate Should animals be tested on?Download