Modern interpretation of the first amendment essay

Context of The Second… The interpretation of the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America has been a topic of controversy since its acceptance over two-hundred years ago. The problem is that firearms have been a part of this nation from the beginning.

This preamble is set out to regulate the other half of the Amendment. Groups like the NRA and ACLU need to work together to find a solution to this gun-control debate so in the end both groups are satisfied with the results. It was also set up to protect us from other countries.

The founding fathers believed that state militias fighting for their country and freedom would be much more effective in battle.

They were to ensure that there would not be a repeat of what the framers had experienced when they set out on their mission to draft a document that would govern our country for years to come.

Having a firearm at that time was so common that they did not even think about having to legalize it.

Without our First Amendment, religious minorities could be mistreated, the government could possibly set up a national religion, protesters could be harmed or jailed, the press would not be able to criticize and report facts regarding the government, and citizens could not organize for changes they believe are needed.

In fact Congress at that time did not even feel it necessary to put an Amendment in the Constitution because having a fire arm was as common as riding a horse.

For this reason, they feared to have a standing army of professionally trained soldiers. In addition, amendment requires that there be a separation maintained between church and state. Although the first amendment was written into our constitution, the translation of the meaning of the written word is often challenged.

They saw a man corrupted by power and using his power to do evil. Constitution is part of our countries Bill of Rights. The founding fathers realized that one man having so much power could be corrupting. To understand what the second Amendment means, one must interpret the actual text, the historical background for its adoption, and what it means today.

Since there are no State Militias do the people have any right to bear Arms?

Modern Interpretation of The First Amendment

There are two freedoms that seem to cause the most contention, the first being freedom of press and the second being the freedom of religion. Today the framers would be both encouraged and discouraged by our modern interpretation the First Amendment the United States Constitution.

The First Amendment

Meaning that the right is giving to the state government not to individual citizens. Yet occasionally these laws are created with disregard to what is stated in our Constitution.

According to this amendment it is up to the State to decide that. Little by little our elected officials have been discounting our Constitution. One can say that it clearly states that the people do have a right to have firearms.

This is how we won the Revolutionary War, by using state militias. In addition, there are people who believe in freedom of religion but only if the faith is similar to their own and there is a constant debate regarding freedom of the press and what newspapers should be able to report.

The founding fathers set up the Second Amendment for the possibility that the government would have to be overthrown. With more and more regulations on firearms being passed, the Second Amendment is the only thing groups like the NRA have to hold on to.The First Amendment The First Amendment to the U.S.

Constitution is part of our countries Bill of Rights. The first amendment is perhaps the most important part of the U.S.

Essay: Context of The Second Amendment

Constitution because the amendment guarantees citizens freedom of religion, speech, writing and publishing, peaceful assembly, and the freedom to raise grievances with the Government/5(1).

Modern and Ancient Interpretations of Xerxes Essays. Modern Interpretation of The First Amendment The first Amendment of the United States Constitution says; “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of.

This essay has been submitted by a law student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. Modern Interpretation Of The First Amendment. Essay about First Amendment Words | 6 Pages. First Amendment The modern American conception of freedom of speech comes from the principles of freedom of the press, and freedom of religion as they developed in England, starting in the seventeenth century.

This essay is going to focus attention on several U.S. Supreme Court Cases that challenged the “First Amendment.” The “ First Amendment ” includes the Right to Choose Ones Religion, and does not allow the government to create any laws in respect to establishing a religion.

The First Amendment to the Constitution restricts government from discrimination of religions, and this is beneficial to our nation in many ways. Particularly because the United States was established on the basis of the emphasis on freedom, this amendment holds important value to .

Modern interpretation of the first amendment essay
Rated 3/5 based on 6 review