Is this a review? This novel makes it clear that mercy is the best way to kill people with disabilities, it takes the cruelty out of killing by making it more kind. What is your extent of a friendship? Even if they did make it to the next town, being the odd cards of the deck would make it easier for Curley and his men to find them due to the witnesses.
But it was quick, less depressing and Lennie was happy. Regarding to the story, replace the stranger as the short insecure man whom they call Curley, your friend as Lennie, and yourself as George.
Now think about this; would you rather kill your best friend, or have a total stranger do it? You are not logged in, but you can still leave a comment or review. It was better for George to kill Lennie, because he knew how to comfort him—and Lennie was always at ease with George and believed in him.
The stranger plans to torture your friend right before he dies. Death is the one thing all of humanity will eventually face. George and Lennie were best friends for a long time—more like brothers.
George killed his best friend out of love; he loved Lennie so much that he rather kill Lennie himself then to have Curley kill Lennie out of spite. The stranger happens to loathe your friend because he accidently killed someone the stranger cared for.
Probably not—so look at it this way; your friend is mentally ill, treated like a dog, and respect is far from reach. For numerous reasons, a broad amount of people think murder is immoral—especially if it was your own best friend.
I hereby state that I strongly believe George was the right person to kill Lennie, therefore made the right decision to, rather than to let him suffer in the hands of Curley. Capital punishment is necessary depending on the situation, but mercy killing is the best when it came to people or animals with incapacities.
George committed mercy killing by shooting Lennie. This is one of the reasons why I think George had the right to shoot Lennie—there was no escape, and it was either Curley to kill him, or George.
But if you think about it, Curley and his men were on horses, with guns. How far are you willing to go to help the person you care for? Leave your email if you would like to be notified when your message is approved. We can all argue back and forth whether George killing Lennie was wrong or not.
What were his options? It could be seen as an end or an entrance. Yes, I do—it saved them both. No one can outrun a bullet unless you miss—however the chances of getting shot at would be quite high. Lennie like the dog would have been tortured or beaten to death once Curley discovered who killed his wife.
Killing Lennie was easy, yet emotionally hard for George to overcome. Mercy killing may sound like a dreadful thing to do, but would you rather see a loved one suffering, and in misery, or would you rather see them finally resting and happily at peace? The two had planned a future together—a future in their own dream ranch.
Mercy killing is killing out of love; it takes love and courage to know that an animal or a friend like Lennie is better off dead. So what could George do? So knowing that, we can already say that Curley and the others were near. It is for the best to kill someone out of mercy, and put them out of their misery, than to do capital punishment which beats and tortures them to death.
Would you choose then? So do I think George was right for killing Lennie? Right before George put him out from the back of the head with the Luger, he made Lennie think of their future home—their ranch and the rabbits Lennie would tend.
Even though George did not feel right in killing his only best friend, he realized that his actions were justified because Lennie was going to die regardless.Of Mice and Men Essay: Persuasive Essay “There is a significant disparity of treatment in the way the criminal justice system handles things.
Unfortunately, there's a double standard because there is a double standard in society.” David Raybin. In the novel, Of Mice and Men, by John Steinbeck; Steinbeck introduces two men, George and Lennie.
Published: Thu, 14 Dec John Steinbeck’s novel, Of Mice and Men, was first published in At the time, America was still suffering the grim aftermath of the depression and the itinerant workers who form the basis of the novel were very much within the consciousness of a nation separated by wealth yet driven by the idea of ‘the.
Of Mice and Men John Steinbeck Of Mice and Men essays are academic essays for citation. These papers were written primarily by students and provide critical analysis of Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck.
Of Mice and Men Persuasive Essay. In this story Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, The true strength of an essay lies within structure. Yours was excellent. Your introduction, where you bring up the idea that "We all face death" is then yet again stated in your conclusion paragraph.
To me, that is like tying the knot.
Of Mice and Men Expository Essay John Steinback’s Of Mice and Men is a book that describes the chase of the American Dream. Although achieving the American Dream is a great desire for all, seldom does it actually come true. There is a significant disparity of treatment in the way the criminal justice system handles things.
Unfortunately, there’s a double standard because there is a double standard in society. ” David Raybin. In the novel, Of Mice and Men, by John Steinbeck; Steinbeck introduces two men, George and Lennie, who live in Salinas, California. The [ ].Download